Written by Sulaiman Razvi
Hinduism presents early marriage as a moral obligation, particularly for girls. Several Smriti and Purana sources state that failing to marry a girl before the onset of puberty constitutes a serious sin. According to the scriptures, the forefathers of the girl shall drink the blood of her monthly courses if she is not married before puberty. Conversely, marrying a girl before puberty is described as a meritorious act capable of sanctifying multiple generations.
These texts also impose strict caste-based and sexual regulations. A Brahmin man marrying a Shudra woman is condemned and labelled Vrisalapati, a term used to denote ritual degradation. Notably, this same label is applied to a man who marries a girl after the onset of menstruation, indicating that post-pubescent marriage was treated as ritually improper. In a similar vein, a girl who remains in her father’s house after menstruation is described as fallen or degraded. Some Smriti and Purana prescriptions even state that a man of thirty should marry a girl of twelve, reflecting a normative endorsement of paedophilia.
Taken together, these prescriptions reveal a lack of consensus among Hindu lawgivers on prohibiting practices that modern standards would classify as paedophilia. Rather than uniformly condemning such practices, the consensus among authoritative texts appears to normalise or even explicitly endorse them. Historically, child marriage and paedophilia were widespread in India well into the late nineteenth century. For example, when the British colonial government introduced the Age of Consent Bill of 1891–92, which sought to raise the age of consent for girls from ten to twelve, several prominent Hindu leaders, including Bal Gangadhar Tilak, opposed the reform on the grounds that it violated Hindu customs.
Historical examples further illustrate the social acceptance of child marriage during this period. Rabindranath Tagore, the renowned poet and composer of the Indian national anthem, was twenty-two years old when he married Mrinalini Devi, who was ten, in 1883. Evidence from the Puranas also suggests that such practices were prevalent at the time of their composition. Although Hindu personal law was later codified and child marriage was made illegal, the practice has not been entirely eradicated and continues all over India today.
Practice of Child Marriage in Modern India
– 84% Of 12 million married children under the age of 10 are Hindus.
(Source: Business-Standard.com)
– 33 per cent of the world’s child brides are in India: Report based on last Census
(Source: HindustanTimes.com)
– India has second highest number of child marriages as per UNICEF’s 2014 report.
(Source: TheHindu.com)
– As per 2016 report, 30% of women were married under the age of 18 years due to cultural impact.
(Source: IndianExpress.com)
– 71% of those married in Uttar Pradesh are minor girls
(Source: TimesofIndia.com)
Sexual assault on children is on the rise in India, According to the National Crime Records Bureau a total of 12,363 cases of child rape were reported in the country during 2013 as compared to 8,541 in 2012 accounting for an increase of 44.7%. The maximum child rape cases were reported in Madhya Pradesh (2,112 cases) followed by Maharashtra (1,546 cases) and Uttar Pradesh (1,381 cases). These three states together accounted for 40.8% of the total child rape cases reported in the country.
(Source: TimesofIndia.com)
Hindu Scholars on Age of Marriage
There is a notable reluctance within certain Hindu circles to acknowledge systemic religious or social malpractices, with a tendency instead to attribute such phenomena to external influences, specifically Muslim conquests. Apologists often contend that child marriage was an alien custom introduced by Muslim invaders, however, this narrative is directly contradicted by the writings of their own revered figures. Swami Vivekananda, for instance, candidly acknowledged that the foundational framework of Hinduism permits paedophilia, thereby refuting the claim that these practices were merely recent historical impositions.
“…A girl of eight is married to a man of thirty, and the parents are jubilant over it…. And if anyone protests against it, the plea is put forward, “Our religion is being overturned.” What sort of religion have they who want to see their girls becoming mothers before they attain puberty even and offer scientific explanations for it? Many, again, lay the blame at the door of the Mohammedans. They are to blame, indeed! Just read the Grihya-Sutras through and see what is given as the marriageable age of a girl. … There it is expressly stated that a girl must be married before attaining puberty. The entire Grihya-Sutras enjoin this…” The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Volume 6/Epistles – Second Series/LXXI Rakhal (Source)
It therefore becomes untenable to deny that paedophilic practices find sanction within certain Hindu religious texts and traditions, and that these practices originated from within Hinduism itself rather than being introduced by external forces. This position is further reinforced by the writings of Swami Prabhupada, the founder of ISKCON, who stated:
“…As soon as a woman attains the age of puberty, she immediately becomes very much agitated by sexual desire. It is therefore the duty of the father to get his daughter married before she attains puberty…” Swami Prabhupada on Srimad Bhagavatam 4.25.42 (Source)
Swami Prabhupada also writes, “Even an eighty-years-old man can marry a sixteen-years-old girl.” (Source)
Swami Prabhupada writes, “All my sisters were married within twelve years. My second sister, she became twelve years, and I heard my mother become so disturbed: “Oh, this girl is not being married. I shall commit suicide…And she was given to a boy, my brother-in-law, for the second marriage. Means that my brother-in-law lost his first wife, and still, he was twenty-one years old. My sister was twelve years old and brother-in-law was twenty-one. In the sastra… I do not know exactly what is that sastra, but they say that if the girl before marriage has menstruation, then the father has to eat that menstrual liquid. Means it is, mean, very strict. And if the father is not living, then the elder brother has to eat. (break) …ty of getting the girl married rests on the father. In the absence of the father, the eldest brother. The girl must be married. That is it. It is called daya, kanya-daya.” (Source)
Another Hindu scholar, Sadhguru, implicitly endorses the practice of child marriage.
“It’s a tragic situation. We should realise that we are a society in transition. There was a time when girls would be married at 15. Now they are not married till 25 and 30. So this is the peak of their hormones. In our mindset we are in the past, but in our physical situation, we are in the present. What is causing these rapes? Humans have their needs. If you keep them suppressed, they will do something violent. We need to address this on a much larger scale – hanging rapists or putting them behind bars, that is not the solution. Yes, it needs to be done when it happens. But more importantly as a society, we need to understand why.” (Source)
Commentator Kulluka Acharya explained Manu Smriti 9.88 in the following way.
“To a groom [who is] excellent by lineage, conduct, and so forth, handsome, [and] of the same caste, even [if she has] not reached the [prescribed] age—because of the Smriti (legal code) of Daksha [which states]: ‘One should marry [her off at] eight years [of age]; in this way, Dharma is not lost’—therefore, even before that time, one should give the daughter [in marriage] according to the rite of the Brahma marriage.”
Translator of Mahabharata Kisari Mohan Ganguli writes.
“Vrishalipati literally means the husband of a Sudra woman. By actually marrying a woman of the lowest order, by marrying before the elder brother, by marrying a girl that has attained to puberty, and by certain other acts, a Brahmana comes to be regarded as a Vrishalipati.” K.M. Ganguli on Mahabharata 13.126 (Source)
Rama Married Six Years old Sita
As per Valmiki Ramayana, Rama is said to have married Sita when she was 6 years old.
Valmiki Ramayana, Aranya Kanda 3, Sarga 47, Verses 3-5 “I am the daughter of noble-souled Janaka, the king of Mithila, by name I am Seetha, and the dear wife and queen of Rama, let safety betide you. On residing in the residence of Ikshvaku-s in Ayodhya for twelve years, I was in sumptuosity of all cherishes while relishing all humanly prosperities. In the thirteenth year the lordly king Dasharatha deliberated together with his imperial ministers to anoint Rama as Crown Prince of Ayodhya. When Raghava’s anointment was being organised my venerable mother-in-law known as Kaikeyi begged her husband Dasharatha for a boon. Restraining my veracious father-in-law by a good deed once done by her in his respect, Kaikeyi besought two boons from him, namely expatriation of my husband, and anointment of her son Bharata. ‘If Rama is anointed now, come what may I will not eat, sleep, or drink, and my life ends this way,’ thus Kaikeyi was adamantine, and the king and my father-in-law entreated her who is nagging with meaningful riches, but she did not make good on that entreaty. My great-resplendent husband was of twenty-five years of age at that time, and to me eighteen years are reckoned up from my birth.” Tr. Desiraju Hanumantha Rao (Source)
A simple calculation follows from this account. If Sita was eighteen years old at the time of exile and had already spent twelve years living with Rama in Ayodhya, it necessarily implies that she was six years old at the time of her marriage. The Skanda Purana makes this point even more explicit, it clearly states that Rama married Sita when she was six years old, while Rama himself was fifteen at the time. The passage leaves little room for reinterpretation, as it explicitly mentions both the age of Sita and the age of Rama at the time of marriage.
Skanda Purana Book, III, Section 2, Chapter 30, Verses 8-9 “The bow of Isvara that was kept in the abode of Janaka, was broken. In his fifteenth year, O king, Rama married the six year old beautiful daughter of the king of Mithila, Sita who was not born of a womb. On getting Sita, Raghava became contented and happy.” Tr. Ganesh Vasudeo Tagare (Source)
This understanding is further reinforced by the renowned Hindu scholar Jagadguru Rambhadracharya, who, while commenting on the Valmiki Ramayana, affirms that Sita was six years old at the time of her marriage. Taken together, these scriptural references and scholarly acknowledgements undermine later apologetic attempts to deny or obscure the textual evidence.
You can download this video by clicking here. You can also find this video on Youtube.
Hindu scholars Ramswaroop Acharya Maharaj and Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya have stated that Sita was married to Rama at the age of six.
Download this video.
Krishna Married Eight Years old Rukmini and many Prepubescent Girls
Rukmini
According to the Puranas, Krishna is described as having married Rukmini when she was still prepubescent, at the age of eight. While these texts do not explicitly state Krishna’s age at the time of the marriage, their portrayal of him clearly indicates that he was already an adult. Moreover, several Puranic accounts describe Krishna engaging in sexual relations with Rukmini after the marriage. Such descriptions presuppose physical maturity and adult agency on his part.
According to the Skanda Purana, at Rukmini’s birth an ethereal voice instructed her father, Bhishmaka, to give her in marriage to the four-armed one born on earth. When Rukmini reached the age of eight, Bhishmaka grew anxious about fulfilling this command. At that time, Damaghosa suggested that his son Shishupala considered as the four-armed one, and the marriage was accordingly arranged. However, Krishna abducted Rukmini, with her consent, after she fell in love with him. During the abduction, her brother Rukmi confronted Krishna and was defeated. Krishna spared Rukmi at Rukmini’s request, though he humiliated him by tonsuring his head, as also noted in the Bhagavata Purana. Krishna then summoned Brahmins descended from sages, and the marriage ceremony was performed.
This account differs from the Srimad Bhagavatam, which describes the event as a Swayamvara attended by many kings. While the Bhagavatam does not specify the ages of Krishna or Rukmini, it explicitly states that Rukmini had not attained puberty at the time of her marriage.
Skanda Purana Book V, Section iii, Chapter 142, Verses 8-79 “…The second child born was a daughter named Rukmini. At that time an unembodied ethereal voice told him, ‘O Bhismaka, this girl should be given to a Four-armed One (born) on this earth.’… As time passed on she became a girl of eight years. The king recollected the words of the embodied being and became worried. ‘To whom shall I give this daughter? Who will be the four-armed one?’… In the meantime Damaghosa, the chieftain of Cedi came there from the excellent mountain Raivata. He entered the royal palace where King Bhismaka was present. On seeing him arrived in the abode, the king duly adored him. He was taken to the Royal Court and given a proper seat. ‘This day has dawned meritoriously. I was eager to see you. O great king, my daughter has come to the age of eight years. The ethereal voice of an unembodied being has told that she should be given to a Four-armed one.’ On hearing the words of Bhismaka, Damaghosa said thus: ‘My son is well known in all the three worlds as Four-armed One (Caturbhuja). O Bhismaka, let this girl be given to Sisupala.’ On hearing the words of Damaghosa, O king, Rumini was betrothed to Sisupala by Bhismaka. The auspicious ceremonial beginning was made by Bhismaka, O Yudhisthira. All the kinsmen and members of the family who were staying far-off countries in every direction, were invited and they duly arrived…At the time of dusk, Rukmini, the bride of seductive charms, went out of the city accomplished by her female companions for the worship of Ambika. There she saw Hari, the Lord of Devas, in the guise of a cowherd. On seeing him, she was excited by the god of Love and became completely fascinated. On seeing her, Kesava said to Sankarsana, ‘On dear brother in my view the excellent jewel of a girl should be taken away.’ On hearing the words of Kesava, Sankarsana said: ‘Go ahead, O Krsna, O mighty one. Let the jewel of a girl be seized quickly. I shall follow you closely behind causing much havoc unto all these demons. On getting the consent of Sankarsana, Kesava, the slayer of Kesin, seized the girl, immediately put her on the chariot and went off…Rukma said: O Lord Kesava, unlucky and sinful that I am, I had hit your chest with arrows. It behoves you to forgive me. Formerly Janaki was given over to you by Janaka himself. Now, O lord of Devas, Rukmini is offered unto you by me. Marry her duly in accordance with the injunctions…When Rukma went back Krsna invited excellent Brahmanas. They were the seven mental sons of Brahma…In this manner the Slayer of Madhu honoured them duly and perfectly and then grasped the hand of Rukmini in marriage.” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
This evidence proves that Krishna married Rukmini when she was only eight years old. Moreover, the Srimad Bhagavatam (Bhagavad Purana), regarded by Krishna devotees as the most revered Purana, explicitly states that Rukmini had not attained puberty at the time of her marriage.
तां देवमायामिव धीरमोहिनीं
सुमध्यमां कुण्डलमण्डिताननाम् ।
श्यामां नितम्बार्पितरत्नमेखलां
व्यञ्जत्स्तनीं कुन्तलशङ्कितेक्षणाम् ।
शुचिस्मितां बिम्बफलाधरद्युति-
शोणायमानद्विजकुन्दकुड्मलाम् ॥ ५१ ॥
tāṁ deva-māyām iva dhīra-mohinīṁ
su-madhyamāṁ kuṇḍala-maṇḍitānanām
śyāmāṁ nitambārpita-ratna-mekhalāṁ
vyañjat-stanīṁ kuntala-śaṅkitekṣaṇām
Srimad Bhagavatam Canto 10, Chapter 53, Verse 51 “Beholding that charming princess Rukmini gifted with a beautiful waist, a countenance adorned with Kundalas, not attaining the age of puberty, with a golden mekhala beautifying her waist, with rising signs of womanhood, with moving eyes as if in fear…” Tr. J.M. Sanyal (Source)
The following is the translation by Gita Press.
Srimad Bhagavatam 10.53.51 “Smitten with love kindled (in their breast) by her, the illustrious warriors assembled (there) felt bewildered to behold the princess, who was possessed of a shapely (slender) waist and had not yet attained puberty, and who had a girdle of jewels thrown about her hips and in whom signs of womanhood were (just) manifesting themselves…” Tr. Gita Press Publications (Source)
The following is the Hindi translation by Pandit Kanhaiyalal Upadhyay.
The following is an English retranslation of the above Hindi translation.
“Like the Divine Illusion (Devamaya), she produced delusion even among steady-minded men; her waist region was exceedingly beautiful and her face was adorned with the luster of earrings; she who has not attained puberty; a golden girdle was fastened upon the region of her hips; her breasts were manifesting and her eyes were restless, being terrified by the fear of her locks of hair.” (Source)
Sridhara Svami commented on this verse as follows,
“Upon seeing Shri Rukminiji, the groups of warriors became infatuated. ‘Shyamam’ means one who has not yet reached menarche (attained puberty). Due to her cascading tresses, her eyes appeared somewhat restless.” Sridhara Svami on Srimad Bhagavatam 10.53.51 (Source)
Sridhara Svami was a preeminent fourteenth century scholar and the tenth Shankaracharya of the Govardhan Math at Puri, one of the four cardinal monasteries established by Adi Shankaracharya. Given his scholarly authority and institutional stature, Sridhara Svami’s definition alone is sufficient to settle the argument.
Viraghavacharya commented on it as follows,
“…She who deludes the heroes; likewise, she whose waist-region is elegant and slender. She whose countenance is adorned by two earrings; that Shyama—one in whom menstruation has not yet appeared. She upon whose hips and loins a gem-studded girdle is bound. She whose breasts were manifest, indicating the emergence of her youth. She whose tremulous eyes appeared as if apprehensive of her own locks of hair.” Srimad Bhagavata Chandra-Chandrika, By Srimad Viraghavacharya (Source)
Bhagavatprasadacharya commented on it as follows.
“Regarding “her”: She was like the divine Maya of the Lord, possessing a form that enchants the entire world. She was of such a nature as to delude even the heroic. Her midsection was exquisitely slender. Her face was adorned with two earrings. She was a Syama in whom the menses had not yet appeared (ajata-rajaskam). Her hips were bound by a girdle of jewels. Her breasts indicated the burgeoning onset of youth, and her eyes were restless, appearing as if they were startled by the locks of her own hair.” Bhagavatprasadacharya in Bhaktamanoranjani on Srimad Bhagavatam 10.53.51
Vishvanatha Chakravarti commented on it as follows,
“…Manifesting the characteristics thus stated, she whose two breasts were only just becoming manifest [emerging], she whose two eyes were as if frightened by [her] locks of hair, and as if flickering.” Sarartha Darshini by Vishvanatha Chakravarti (Source)
The Sanskrit word used in Srimad Bhagavatam is Shyama, also spelled Syama, which in this context denotes a pre pubescent girl. This is reinforced by the compound Stanim Vyanjit, meaning that her breasts were only beginning to bud, a clear indication that she had not yet attained puberty. This directly contradicts the apologist claim that she was around sixteen years of age, since breast development does not begin at that stage. While Shyama is a multivalent term and can also mean dark complexioned, or according to some scholars, one who feels warm in winter and cool in summer, these secondary meanings do not negate its primary physiological sense in the present context.
A Hindu scholar named Swami Venkatesananda writes.
“After the wordhip Rukmini took part of the offerings she had made to the goddess, as a token of the goddess’s blessings. She then left the temple and was talking towards the waiting chariot. Rukmini, who was of exquisite beauty though she had not yet attained puberty, looked for Krsna among the assembled princes. These princes, who had been robbed of their senses by her great charm, had for the moment been paralysed, and stood gaping. As she was about to mount her chariot, Krsna sprang forward, grasped her hand and helped her to his own vehicle, while the princes still stood looking on helplessly. However, as Krsna’s vehicle moved towards Dvaraka, the princes, headed by Jarasandha, began to say to one another: ‘What a disgrace: while we great warriors were watching, the cowherds snatched away a princess!” The Concise Srimad Bhagavatam, By Swami Venkatesananda, page 292, Publisher SUNY Press, 1989 (Source)
Harivamsa Purana also states that Rukmini had not attained puberty,
कृष्णेन मनसा दृष्टा दुर्निरीक्ष्या सुरैरपि ॥
श्यामावदाता सा ह्य् आसीत् पृथुचार्व् आयतेक्षणा ।
ताम्रौष्ठनयनापाङ्गी पीनोरुजघनस्तनी ॥
kṛṣṇena manasā dṛṣṭā durnirīkṣyā surairapi ||
śyāmāvadātā sā hy āsīt pṛthucārv āyatekṣaṇā |
tāmrauṣṭhanayanāpāṅgī pīnorujaghanastanī ||
Harivamsa Purana 2.59.37 “By Krishna, she was beheld with the mind; she who was difficult to be gazed upon even by the gods. She was indeed one who has not attained puberty and was dazzlingly pure; she possessed broad, beautiful, and elongated eyes.”
Interestingly, this very verse is repeatedly cited by Hindu apologists to claim that Rukmini was sixteen years old. The Sanskrit term used here is Shyama, also spelled Syama, which some translators wrongly interpret as denoting a specific age of sixteen. This reading finds no support in the textual tradition. The same term appears in Srimad Bhagavatam 10.53.51, which has already been cited. I have referenced the translations of Gita Press, Pandit Kanhaiyalal Upadhyay, and J. M. Sanyal, along with the commentaries of Sridhara Svami, Bhagavatprasadacharya and Viraghavacharya. All of them consistently interpret Shyama as referring to one who has not yet attained puberty or whose menstruation has not begun. This uniform understanding across both translators and classical commentators directly undermines the apologist claim.
Manmatha Nath Dutt, in his translation of the Harivamsa Purana, likewise does not translate the term as referring to a sixteen year old girl, but instead renders it as dark or blue hued in complexion. In his edition, this passage appears in Chapter 60, rather than Chapter 59 as cited above.
Harivamsa Purana 2.60.37 “…That damsel of dark-blue hue and large eyes, Rukshmini, was seated on a car. And though the gods even could not see her with their mind Krishna could see her…” Tr. Manmatha Nath Dutt (Source)
The following verse is also cited by apologists to substantiate their claim that Rukmini had attained puberty.
ददर्श रुक्मिणीं देवीमतीव नवयौवनाम्। रत्नपर्यङ्कमारुह्य शयानां सस्मितं मुदा॥४॥ अप्रौढां च नवोढां तां नवसंगमलज्जिताम्। अमूल्यरत्ननिर्माणभूषणेन विभूषिताम्॥५॥ सुचारुकबरीभारां मालतीमाल्यभूषिताम्। दृष्ट्वा कृष्णं भीष्मकन्या सहसा प्रणनाम सा॥६॥
dadarśa rukmiṇī devīmatīva navayauvanām | ratnaparyaṅkamāruhya śayānāṃ sasmitaṃ mudā || 4 || aprauḍhāṃ ca navoḍhāṃ tāṃ navasaṃgamalajjitām | amūlyaratnanirmāṇabhūṣaṇena vibhūṣitām || 5 || sucārukabarībhārāṃ mālatīmālyabhūṣitām | dṛṣṭvā kṛṣṇaṃ bhīṣmakanyā sahasā praṇanāma sā || 6 ||
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda, chapter 112, verses 1-10 “…Lord Krishna beheld the smiling Rukmini in the prime of her youth lying down with great pleasure on a bed adorned with gems. She was not yet fully developed and had just attained puberty…” Tr. Rajendra Nath Sen (Source)
The Sanskrit words mentioned here are,
Aprauḍhāṃ – Incomplete maturation, or a girl who was recently married and had not yet experienced her first menstruation.
Navayauvanām – Refers to the onset of womanhood.
Navoḍhāṃ – Newly wedded
Sanskrit dictionaries define the word Apraudha as follows,
अप्रौढ aprauḍha a. 1 Not arrogant. -2 Timid, gentle, not bold. -3 Not full-grown. –ढा 1 An unmarried girl. -2 A girl very recently married and not arrived at puberty or womanhood.
Source: V.S. Apte: The practical Sanskrit-English dictionary (Sanskritdictionary.com and Digital South Asia Library, University of Chicago Library)
Learnsanskrit.cc website defines it as follows,
“अप्रौढा apraudha one very recently married and not come to womanhood.”
The translator Rajendra Nath Sen has correctly rendered the term Apraudha as “she was not yet fully developed.” The two Sanskrit dictionary screenshots cited above corroborate this definition, demonstrating that the translation is lexically grounded rather than interpretive, and leaving little room for alternative, apologetic reinterpretations. To reconcile the assertion that she was not yet fully developed despite having reached the threshold of puberty, her condition must be understood as emergent rather than established. The description indicates the onset of pubescence, a transitional phase in which development has begun but the physical markers of adulthood are not yet complete. This is directly supported by Srimad Bhagavatam 10.53.51, which uses the metaphor of breasts that are just budding, denoting the earliest stage of breast development. She is therefore depicted not as a fully mature adult, but as an adolescent in the initial phase of biological maturation, positioned between childhood and womanhood.
However, even if this passage were taken to indicate that she had attained puberty, it does not override the testimony of the Skanda Purana or the Srimad Bhagavatam (Bhagavata Purana), nor does it invalidate or refute the verses found in those texts. Rather, these accounts should be read as parallel narrative strands within the Puranic tradition, reflecting variant tellings rather than serving as evidence that nullifies earlier or divergent descriptions.
Does Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda 105.10–12 state that Rukmini had attained puberty? The English translation by Rajendra Nath Sen, presented below, makes no mention of puberty at all.
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda, 105.11-19 “…My lovely daughter is growing day by day; therefore it is proper to celebrate her wedding…” Tr. Rajendra Nath Sen (Source)
Verses 1 to 10 of the same chapter explicitly depict her as engaged in childlike sports.
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda, chapter 105, verses 1-10 “…The monarch Bhismaka observed his beautiful daughter engaged in child-like sports and increasing in splendour day by day like a digit of the moon in the midst of clouds. Considering it advisable to marry his youthful and lovely daughter…” Rajendra Nath Sen (Source)
Combined with the series of refutations presented above, this decisively destroys the narrative promoted by Hindu apologists.
Kubja
The Brahma Vaivarta Purana recounts an episode involving Kubja, an elderly hunchback woman identified as the reincarnation of Surpanakha, the sister of Ravana. According to the text, Krishna transformed Kubja into a young girl of twelve years and then entered into marital relations with her, after which she died. While the Purana does not explicitly state Krishna’s age, other passages describe him as being roughly the same age as Kubja following her rejuvenation. This portrayal suggests that the narrative intends to present both figures as similarly aged, despite the absence of a precise numerical age for Krishna.
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda, chapter 72, verses 21-68 “Thereafter at the sight of lord Krsna, the old woman was filled with grace achieving youthfulness…Sanctified by fire and was adorned with several types of gem studded ornaments having a youthful age of twelve years…Instead of waking all the attendants of Kubja, lord woke her up alone and spoke to the chaste lady. Lord Krsna said…”wake up and let me enjoy the love sport with you because in earlier birth you happened to be Surpanakha, the sister of Ravana. O damsel, during my incarnation as Rama you had performed the tapas for me…Thus speaking lord Krsna embraced her and unrobing her, enjoyed her passionate advances…The lord took her in his lap like Laksmi… the lord was well versed in the art of making love and both of them did not rest during the physical union and they enjoyed the love sport in various ways. Lord Krsna scratched her breasts and the pelvic region with the nails and also sucked her nectar like lips. At the end of the night the lord implanted the semen in her womb after which the beautiful damsel fainted…Thereafter the plane from Goloka arrived and she attaining the divine form went to Goloka…She was having the complexion of molten gold becoming eternal and devoid of birth and death.” Tr. Shanti Lal Nagar (Source)
16,100 Wives
Hindu scriptures also state that Krishna married 16,100 women after liberating them from the demon Narakasura. At the same time, these same traditions maintain that Krishna died at an advanced age. The Vishnu Purana 5.37.15–20 indicates that Krishna lived for over a hundred years, while some Hindu scholars place his lifespan at approximately 120 to 125 years.
Further accounts raise additional questions. The Devi Bhagavatam 2.28.1-23 and the Padma Purana 1.23.91-121; 1.23.74b-87a state that after Krishna’s death, his 16,100 wives were abducted by bandits or fishermen and were subsequently forced into prostitution. Refer my article How Krishna Died & What Happened To His Wives? This narrative invites critical scrutiny. It is difficult to explain why abductors motivated by sexual exploitation would target elderly women, particularly when younger women would have been available in a city such as Dvaraka. This strongly suggests that Krishna’s wives were relatively young at the time of his death and much younger when he married them.
Hindu Gods Attempted to Marry off Pre-Pubescent Parvati to Shiva
Unlike the cases of Rama and Krishna, where the ages of the brides are explicitly stated, the case of Shiva is more complex. Hindu texts indicate that gods and sages arranged Parvati’s marriage to Shiva when she was only eight years old, although they do not explicitly state her age at the time the marriage was solemnised. According to the Puranic tradition, after Sati, Shiva’s first wife, immolated herself, Shiva vowed not to marry again. Sati was then reborn as Parvati, the daughter of King Himavat.
This narrative appears in several texts, including the Skanda Purana, Shiva Purana, and Vamana Purana, with minor variations. The accounts in the Shiva Purana and Skanda Purana are largely similar and are therefore considered together here. In these versions, Himavat approaches Shiva with Parvati and pays obeisance while Shiva is absorbed in meditation. Himavat requests that Parvati, accompanied by her attendants, be allowed to serve Shiva, but Shiva refuses. However, sages had already foretold that Parvati was destined to become Shiva’s wife, prompting Parvati to undertake penance to obtain him as her husband.
These acts are attributed to a girl who was only eight years old at the time. The verses cited below describe Parvati before she had begun this penance, thereby situating the narrative firmly within the context of her childhood.
Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita, Parvati Khanda, section III, chapter 8, verse 51-52 “On hearing the story from Narada, Parvati bent down her head in bashfulness but her smile heightened the beauty of her face. On hearing the story, the lord of mountains stroked her fondly, kissed her on the head and placed her on his seat.” Tr. J.L. Shastri (Source)
The Skanda Purana and the Shiva Purana both state that Parvati was eight years old when she went to Shiva’s abode, after which she undertook penance.
Skanda Purana I.i.21.1 “Lomasa said: The chaste girl grew up day by day and shone very much. Living in the house of Himalaya, she reached the age of eight years.” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Shiva Purana, Rudrasamhita, Parvatikhanda, section III, chapter 11, verses 1-2 “Brahma said:- O Narada, the daughter of the mountain, honoured in the three worlds, was brought up in the palace of Himacala. When she was eight years old, Siva distressed by Sati’s separation came to know of her birth. Keeping her wonderful memory within his heart He rejoiced much.” Tr. J.L. Shastri (Source)
Shiva Purana, Rudrasamhita, Parvatikhanda, section III, chapter 8, verses 4-13 “Himavat said:- O sage Narada…Please read the horoscope of my daughter and tell me about her good and bad fortune. Whose beloved wife will my fortunate daughter be? Narada said: ‘O Mena, O king of mountains, this daughter of yours has all auspicious signs…There is an abnormal line also. Listen to the indication thereof. Her husband will be a naked Yogin, without any qualities. He will be free from lust. He will have neither mother nor father. He will be indifferent to honours. His dress and manners will be inauspicious…O sage, on hearing your words, and inferring that indications referred to Siva, Parvati’s joy knew no bounds.” Tr. J.L. Shastri (Source)
When Shiva was pleased with Parvati’s penance, he sent seven sages to Himavat to seek Parvati’s hand in marriage.
Skanda Purana I.i.23.3-9 “Why have all of you come? Tell me the reason for your visit. Then the Seven Sages said: ‘We have been sent by Mahesa. We have come to you in order to see the girl. O Mountain, understand us. Show us your daughter immediately.’ Saying ‘So be it’ to the group of Sages, Parvati was brought there. Himavan, the lord of Mountains, who loved his children, placed Parvati in his lap and said laughingly. ‘This is my daughter indeed. But listen to my words again. Siva is the most excellent one among ascetics. The destroyer of Madana is devoid of attachment. How does he by whom Smara (Madana) has been made Ananga (bodiless), seek a marriage alliance? Offering the daughter in marriage to the following persons is not recommended: one who is very near (i.e. closely related), one who is very far off, one who is extremely rich one, one who is devoid of wealth, one who is unemployed and a foolish fellow. One shall not offer one’s daughter in marriage to a stupid person, to a person who is devoid of attachment, to a self-esteeming person, to a sick man and to a madcap. Hence, O excellent…” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Ganesh Vasudeo Tagare comments on verse 5: “Evidence of child-marriage at the time of our text. Parvati who performed penance for a long time, must have been too old to sit in the lap of her father.” (Source)
When Narada and the gods approached Himavat and declared that his daughter was destined to marry Shiva, he consented to the marriage, despite her being only eight years old and without consideration of the evident age disparity. Now let’s have a look at Vamana Purana version about the marriage of Shiva and Parvati.
Vamana Purana, Saromahatmya 25.1-7 “Pulastya said Three daughters endowed with beauty and merit were born to Mena and a son named Sunabha was born as the fourth… O sage, six years after their birth, the three daughters born to her, went out to perform penance, Gods saw those handsome girls. The austere Kutila who was as beautiful as the rays of the Moon was then taken to the heaven of Brahman by the Adityas and the Vasus. Then the gods said, ‘O Brahman, please tell us whether she will give birth to a son who will slay Mahisa.” Tr. Anand Swarup Gupta (Source)
Vamana Purana, Saromahatmya 25.8-27 “The great god Brahman said, ‘This austere girl is not capable of holding the semen of Sankara. Leave this poor girl.’ But then O Narada, the enraged Kutila said to Brahmana, ‘O Lord, I shall so endeavour that I hold the semen of Sankara which is very difficult to be born…She too who was called Ragavati, was brought to heaven by the gods. Offering her to Brahman, Prajapati spoke to her in the same manner. Losing her temper, she too said, ‘Truly I shall undergo penance in such a manner that the slayer of Mahisa will become associated with my name. ‘Then the austere Mena knowing, as she did, that the two daughters had already left her, prevented her third daughter from taking to penance. And she exclaimed ‘Uma (O do not practice penance).’ Her mother the brilliant daughter of the Pitrs gave her daughter the name Uma. She then went to the forest…Then Brahman said, ‘She is undoubtedly the consort of Sankara, by whose lustre indeed you have been distracted and have become lustreless…” Tr. Anand Swarup Gupta (Source)
This account indicates that the gods sought to arrange the marriage of a six-year-old girl to Shiva. Swami Parmeshwaranand explains this episode in the following manner.
“Three daughters named Kutila, Ragini and Parvati and a son named Sunabha were born to Himavan by his wife Mena. The three daughters went to the Himalayas for penance, to get Siva as husband. They were not even six years old then. The Devas saw them. The Adityas and the Vasus took Kutila who was doing penance, to the world of the gods. All the gods gathered together and asked Brahma. “Oh Lord, be pleased to tell us if this girl will be able to hear a son who could kill Mahisasura”. Brahma replied. “This poor girl will not be capable of bearing the radiance of Siva. So let her go away.” Kutila got angry at Brahma and said “Lord, I will try to become fit to bear the unbearable radiance of Siva. Harken, I will do penance properly and please Visnu and make Siva bow his head. I take a vow to that effect.” Brahma became angry and told Kutila, “You, wicked Kutila, you did not succumb to my words. So by my curse you will be turned to water.” Kutila having been cursed by Brahma became water and began to flood the world of Brahma. Seeing the flow of water, Brahma made cause-ways on four sides with the Vedas of Rg, Yajus, Sama and Atharva. Thus being tied up she stays in the world of Brahma. The Devas took Ragini also before Brahma and put the same question. The reply of Brahma was the same as before. She also got angry and said to Brahma. “I will do great penance so as to enable to give birth to one in my family to be the killer of Mahisasura.” Brahma cursed her also. “You are deliberately disobeying my words which even Devas won’t gainsay. So you will become the colours of the twilight.” Thus, she became the fast colours of the twilight, and her body was divided among the Pleiades. (Vamana Purana, Chapter 51).” Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Puranas, Volume 1, p.237, by Swami Parmeshwaranand, Published by Sarup & Sons, 01-Jan-2001 (Source)
Hindu Scriptures Promoting Paedophilia/Child Marriage
Dharm Shastras
Manu Smriti 9.94 “A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl eight years of age; if (the performance of) his duties would (otherwise) be impeded, (he must marry) sooner.” Tr. George Buhler (Source)
Manu Smriti 9.88 “To a distinguished, handsome suitor (of) equal (caste) should (a father) give his daughter in accordance with the prescribed rule, though she have not attained (the proper age).” Tr. George Buhler (Source)
Gobhila Grihya Sutra, III Prapathaka, 4 Kandika, verses 1-6 “A student, after he has studied the Veda…Should, with the permission) of his parents, take a wife, One who does not belong to the same Gotra, And who is not a Sapinda relation of his mother. The best however, is a ‘naked’ girl.” Tr. Hermann Oldenberg (Source)
Some Hindus distort the Sanskrit word Nagnika as Anagnika in this context. In his footnotes, the translator Hermann Oldenberg notes, “According to the Grihya-samgraha (II, 17.18), a naked girl is one who has not yet the monthly period, or whose breast is not yet developed…”
Medhatithi explained Nagnika as follows.
‘She who has not attained’;—i.e., who has no carnal desires aroused, who is still too young, not having reached the youthful age,—called ‘nagnikā’ in another Smṛti-text; i.e., one in whom the sexual instinct has not arisen, who is only eight or six years old,—but not a mere infant; as is indicated by the qualifications (elsewhere)—‘one who is eight years old.’ Medhatithi on Manu Smriti 9.88 (Source)
Hiranyakesin Grihya Sutra, Prasna I, Patala 6, Section 19, verse 2 “With their permission he should take a wife belonging to the same caste and country, a ‘naked’ girl, a virgin who should belong to a different Gotra (from her husband’s).” Tr. Hermann Oldenberg (Source)
Parasara Smriti 7.5-6 “When the twelfth year is reached by the female child, if the guardian does not give her away in marriage, her fore-fathers drink, without interruption, during each succeeding month, whatever blood is passed in her courses. The mother, and the father, and likewise the eldest brother, all these three relatives will go to hell, if before menstruation they neglect to marry the girl.” (Source)
Yama Samhita verse 22 “The father, who does give away [in marriage] his maiden-daughter after she has attained the twelfth year, drinks her menstrual blood, month after month.” Tr. Manmatha Nath Dutt (Source)
Samvarta Samhita verses 66-68 “[A maiden] eight years [old] becomes Gouri; one of nine years a Rohini; and of ten years, a Kanya (maiden); and after that, a Rajasvala (a woman in menses). By seeing a maiden in menses, her mother, father and eldest brother these three go to hell. Therefore one should espouse a maiden before she has menstruated; the marriage of an eight years old maiden is most preferrable.” Tr. Manmatha Nath Dutt (Source)
Vishnu Smriti 24.41 “A damsel whose menses begin to appear (while she is living) at her father’s house, before she has been betrothed to a man, has to be considered as a degraded woman: by taking her (without the consent of her kinsmen) a man commits no wrong.” Tr. Julius Jolly (Source)
Gautama Dharmashastra 18.21-23 “A girl should be given in marriage before (she attains the age of) puberty. He who neglects it, commits sin. Some (declare, that a girl shall be given in marriage) before she wears clothes.” Tr. George Buhler (Source)
Baudhayana Dharmashastra, Prasna 4, Adhyaya 1, verse 11 “Let him give his daughter, while she still goes naked, to a man who has not broken the vow of chastity and who possesses good qualities, or even to one destitute of good qualities; let him not keep (the maiden) in (his house) after she has reached the age of puberty.” Tr. George Buhler (Source)
Vasishtha Dharmashastra 17.70 ‘Out of fear of the appearance of the menses let the father marry his daughter while she still runs about naked. For if she stays (in the house) after the age of puberty, sin falls on the father” Tr. George Buhler (Source)
Vyasa Samhita 2.2-4-7 “…of auspicious signs, clad in silken garments, and not above eight years of age, and whose paternal ancestors to the tenth degree in the ascending line were all men of renown, should be solemnly wedded by a (twice-born) according to religious rites, if preferred in marriage…The sin incidental to (an act of) procuring abortion (lie: destruction of the foetus) is committed, if through the negligence of her giver a girl menstruates before her marriage. He, who does not give away a daughter in marriage before she attains puberty, becomes degraded.” Tr. Manmatha Nath Dutt (Source)
Puranas & Others
The Brahma Purana states that a girl should be given in marriage when she is only four years old.
Brahma Purana: Gautami Mahatmya 95.6-7 “A father who gives his daughter to a handsome person even while she is still a child shall become blessed in the world. If not, the father is a sinner. After the fourth year and before the completion of the tenth year the marriage of his daughter must be performed scrupulously by the father.” Tr. G.P. Bhatt, Edited by J.L. Shastri (Source)
Mahabharata 13.44.13 “A person of thirty years of age should wed a girl of ten years of age called a Nagnika. Or, a person of one and twenty years of age should wed a girl of seven years of age.” Tr. K.M. Ganguli (Source)
Skanda Purana VII.I.205.80-86 “If a girl, before being consecrated by marriage rites, has her menses in the house of her father, her Pitrs become fallen and that girl is called Vrsali. If a Brahmana knowingly marries that girl, they say, he is not fit for a Sraddha. He cannot be in the same row as others. He is a Vrsalipati. Gauri virgin is the best and most important. Rohini is considered as Madhyama (middling). Rajasvala should be known as the bases though equal to her (Rohini) image. When there is no menstrual flow, she is Gauri. When there is the flow she is Rohini. If the girlhood has not fully developed she is Kanya. One without breasts is Nagnika. A seven year old girl is Gauri; nine year old is Nagnika. Ten year old shall be Kanya; above that she is Rajasvala. Through breasts she spoils the family of her father and through menstrual flow, she spoils the desirable goal (salvation) and pleasures of the other worlds of her father. He who marries one with menstrual flow should be known as Vrsalipati.” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Devi Bhagavatam 9.41.26-47 “The World-Mother never stays even for a moment in his house who eats at the house of one who marries an unmarried girl twelve years old in whom menstruation has commenced…” Tr. Swami Vijnananda (Source)
The above two verses regard a man as sinful if he marries a girl whose menstrual cycle has begun while she is still residing in her father’s house. This implication is significant, as it suggests that marriage is expected to occur before the onset of menstruation, thereby endorsing marriage to a premenarcheal girl.
Vishnu Purana 3.10.16 “If he marry, he must select a maiden who is of a third of his age.” Tr. H.H. Wilson (Source)
Padma Purana II.85.62-66a “…Wise men get married their unmarried daughter(s). As long as she does not menstruate (i.e. does not attain puberty)…” Tr. N.A. Deshpande (Source)
Padma Purana II.47.47-65 “…The father should keep his daughter in his house till she becomes eight years old. He should not keep a strong (i.e. grown up) one. Both the parents get the (fruit of the) sin which a daughter, living in her father’s house, commits…” Tr. N.A. Deshpande (Source)
Padma Purana VI.118.2-15 “…A man should marry his daughter as long as she has not attained puberty. Wise men recommend a girl’s marriage when she is eight years old…” Tr. N.A. Deshpande (source)
Garuda Purana chapter 95 “…The relations of a girl incur the sin of wilfully creating a miscarriage, or of killing a foetus in the even of their failing to give her away in marriage before she has commenced to menstruate. A girl is liberty to make her own choice, and to be united with a husband, in the absence of any such relation to give her away in marriage…” Tr. M.N. Dutt (Source)
Brahmanda Purana 2.3.19.11 “Many sons should be sought so that at least one would go to Gaya, one shall marry a girl of the Gauri type (i.e. of eight years or one who is a virgin) or one shall discharge a Nala (? lean like a red) bull.” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Vayu Purana 21.12-15 “…It is better to wish for many sons. At least one of them will go to Gaya or marry a girl eight years old or discharge a blue ox (free to wander).’ Brhaspati said: A son begot after marrying after marrying a girl of eight years sanctifies twentyone generations. Moreover, he sanctifies six generations in the family of his maternal uncle. This is remembered as the benefit (of such marriage).” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Ganesha Khanda, chapter 16, verses 43-52 “He who uses fresh meat, and new gram, who associates with young girls, drinks milk, or takes ghee never acquires decrepitude…” Tr. Rajendra Nath Sen
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda 76.43-52 “…Whoever having decorated his virgin daughter aged eight years with apparel reverentially makes a gift of her to a good Brahmin, reaps the benefits of the gift of Durga.” Tr. Rajendra Nath Sen (Source)
Evidence indicating that girls as young as ten were married
Devi Bhagavatam 3.27.40 “My daughter has come to a marriageable age; I have no money. Her age has exceeded ten years; the marriageable age limit has been exceeded. Alas! What am I to do?” Tr. Swami Vijnananda (Source)
Radha the concubine and aunt of Krishna was married to Rayana at the age of 12.
Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Prakriti Khanda, Chapter 49, Verses 36-40 “In the Varaha-kalpa, Radhika was born in the village of Gokula in the family of a Vaisya cowherd. She was born without any human contact…After the expiry of twelve years, finding her becoming youthful, she was married to a trader named Rayana…” Tr. Shanti Lal Nagar (Source)
Devi Bhagavatam 5.17.3-26 “The King Chandrasena, the father, was very pleased to have this beautiful daughter and gladly called her by the name of Mandodarî. This daughter began to grow daily like the phases of the Moon. When she grew ten years old, she became very handsome. The King now became anxious to have a suitable bridegroom and used to think of it everyday. The Brâhmins then told the king that there was a prince named Kambugrîva, the intelligent son of the powerful king Sudhanvâ of Madra” Tr. Swami Vijnananda (Source)
Skanda Purana III.iii.18.4-6 “When she was aged twelve years, the girl had beauty of form and all good features. A Brahmana named Padmanabha whose wife had passed away, requested for the hand of the girl. The Brahmana had plenty of wealth. He was calm and quiet. He was a permanent companion of the king. So the father of the girl did not dare to refuse. He gave the daughter to him. The marriage was celebrated at midday…” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Skanda Purana VII.I.166.17-20 “…You are to behave in a manner that will give no cause to the Devas to despise me. My dear daughter, I have heard this cited in sacred scriptures. ‘If without being consecrated (in marriage) a girl discharges her menses in her father’s house the father earns the sin of Brahmana-slaying and the girl is known as a Vrsali (Sudra). Therefore, I am sending you off in the company of aged ministers. Hurry up. Choose your own husband and decide.” Tr. G.V. Tagare (Source)
Response to Apologists
Some Hindus have attempted to counter the points raised above with weak and unconvincing arguments. The following response addresses those apologists directly. Although dozens of verses have been cited, several apologists have attempted to challenge only 20 to 30 percent of the material. This selective engagement implicitly concedes that a substantial portion of the article remains unaddressed and effectively irrefutable.
Counter Argument: According to Rig Veda 10.85.40-41 and Padma Purana VI.118.2-15 a girl should be given in marriage only after she attains puberty.
Response: The verse in question merely outlines the biological stages in a girl’s development. It does not state that a daughter should be married only after attaining puberty. In the Atharva Veda, this passage occurs within a prayer offered by a man who thanks the gods for granting him wealth and sons. The reference to conception simply reflects the biological fact that pregnancy is possible only after puberty, which is all that the verse conveys.
The apologist has cited a verse from the Padma Purana out of context in an attempt to support his Rig Vedic claim. Had the verse been presented in its proper context, it would have undermined his own explanation. The following lines of the same passage clearly demonstrate this.
Padma Purana VI.118.2-15 “When small hair appears (on the private parts), Soma enjoys a daughter. When she attains puberty, gandharvas (enjoy her); and when breasts appear (prominent), Fire (enjoys her). A man should marry his daughter as long as she has not attained puberty. Wise men recommend a girl’s marriage when she is eight years old. She should be duly given to a brahmana who is well-versed in sacred learning, possesses moral virtue, has actually studied Vedas, and has observed celibacy. This is said to be the rule regarding a daughter to be given (in marriage).” Tr. N.A. Deshpande (Source)
What is implied here is that a girl should be given in marriage before she is enjoyed by the gods, that is, before she attains puberty. These words are explicitly attributed to the Hindu god Shiva. Furthermore, Rig Vedic verses 36 to 38 indicate that the bride was already married prior to reaching physical maturity and only thereafter began to develop. This sequence clearly contradicts later apologetic claims that these texts promote marriage only after puberty.
Counter Argument: The translation of Valmiki Ramayana about the age of Sita is wrong, here’s the correct translation, she had been in Ikshwaku dynasty of King Dashratha for two years and got all the materialistic pleasure available for human kind. Thereafter, in the third year, the king and lord Dasaratha consulted other kings and ministers to consecrate Rama.” The word Dash here doesn’t mean 10 but mentions Dasharath, so Sita’s age at the time of her marriage was 18-2=16 not 6.
Response: The Sanskrit terms used in these verses are straightforward and easily understood, even by those fluent in Hindi. I therefore quote the original Sanskrit verses below.
उषित्वा द्वा दश समाः इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||
तत्र त्रयो दशे वर्षे राज अमंत्र्यत प्रभुः |
अभिषेचयितुम् रामम् समेतो राज मन्त्रिभिः || ३.४७.४–५
Instead of offering a reasoned explanation of the verses, the apologist has deliberately mistranslated his own scripture. If the word dasha here does not mean ten but is instead claimed to refer to the name Dasharatha, then it becomes necessary to ask how the apologist would express twelve or thirteen in Sanskrit. Some Hindu apologists even claim that Dva Dash doesn’t mean 12 but 22, such reasoning is comparable to claiming that twenty two does not mean 22, but rather twenty multiplied by two.
In Sanskrit, dva means two, dasha means ten, and varsha means years. The same numerical pattern appears consistently in the subsequent verse, where the word trayo clearly means three. These terms are elementary and widely understood, making it unnecessary to cite lexicons for clarification. Moreover, in the Shiva Purana, Section 1, Vidyesvara Samhita, Chapter 15, verses 42 to 45, the word dva-dasha is translated by scholars as twelve.
Apologists conveniently ignore Skanda Purana, Book III, Section 2, Chapter 30, verses 8 to 9, which leaves no ambiguity regarding Sita’s age at the time of her marriage. The text explicitly states that Sita was six years old when she was married. To further address any remaining doubt, I now quote another passage from the Valmiki Ramayana that refers to Sita’s age at the time of her marriage to Rama.
Valmiki Ramayana, Sundara Kanda 5, Chapter 33, Verses 13-14 “I stayed in Rama’s house there for twelve years, enjoying the worldly pleasures belonging to human kind and fulfilling all my desires. Thereafter, in the thirteenth year, King Dasaratha along with his preceptors started to perform anointment of the kingdom to Rama, a celebrity of Ikshvaku dynasty.” Tr. Desiraju Hanumantha Rao (Source)
When the years mentioned in the passage are calculated, the result again confirms that Sita was six years old at the time of her marriage.
Counter Argument: Sita in Valmiki Ramayana 2.118.34 says that her father became anxious when she reached the marriageable age. This proves she was an adult as she reached a marriageable age.
Response: We should not interpret this verse through the lens of modern standards for marriageable age. In Hindu scriptures, the concept of marriageable age differs from contemporary norms. For instance, the Devi Bhagavatam states that a girl who has reached ten years of age is considered marriageable.
Devi Bhagavatam 3.27.40 “My daughter has come to a marriageable age; I have no money. Her age has exceeded ten years; the marriageable age limit has been exceeded. Alas! What am I to do?” Tr. Swami Vijnananda (Source)
Let me once again quote what Swami Vivekananda said.
“Just read the Grihya-Sutras through and see what is given as the marriageable age of a girl. … There it is expressly stated that a girl must be married before attaining puberty. The entire Grihya-Sutras enjoin this…” The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Volume 6/Epistles – Second Series/LXXI Rakhal [Source]
This suggests that, in historical contexts, the threshold for marriageable age was much lower than what is recognized today. Marriage of a girl before she attains puberty is what prescribed in the Hindu scriptures.
Counter Argument: Some Hindu apologists argue that the Skanda Purana Book V, Section iii, Chapter 142 does not definitively establish Rukmini’s age as eight. They contend that the Sanskrit term ‘Adashta Varsha’ contains the prefix ‘Ada’, which they suggest is semantically ambiguous and could potentially imply a much older age, such as a doubling of the years mentioned.
Rebuttal: This argument reflects either confusion or a deliberate attempt to obscure a straightforward meaning. The apologist relies entirely on conjecture. Proponents of this view fail to provide any lexical or textual support to justify such a radical departure from standard Sanskrit interpretation. In classical Sanskrit, the term ashta varsha transparently translates to eight years. Given the absence of credible linguistic evidence to the contrary, the assertion that the Skanda Purana describes Rukmini as an eight year old bride remains academically sound and largely uncontested. Consequently, there is little need to consult specialised lexicons to refute an argument that lacks any substantive textual foundation.
Counter Argument: The gods and sages didn’t attempt to marry off 6 years old Parvati to Shiva, the reference of Vamana Purana given is wrong.
Response: This story is mentioned in Saromahatmya section of Vamana Purana chapter 25, verses 1-27, following is the screenshot from the scripture.
My emphasis is not on the precise age at which Parvati was married to Shiva, as Hindu scriptures do not explicitly state her age at the time of marriage. Rather, the focus lies on the underlying assumption within these texts that a six year old Parvati was already considered capable of holding Shiva’s semen. The narrative implies that the gods had predetermined her biological readiness for conception, despite her young age, revealing troubling assumptions about maturity and reproduction embedded within the tradition.
Counter Argument: Manu Smriti 9.94; Mahabharata 13.44.13 A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of ten or twelve. These verses merely tell the man to simply marry a girl younger than him, these shouldn’t be taken literally as also stated by Medhatithi.
Response: Apologists are engaging in semantic manipulation to distort their own Hindu texts. The prescriptions found in these sources are not rigid commandments requiring a man to marry only at the age of thirty or a girl to be given in marriage only at ten or twelve. This is precisely the point to which Acharya Medhatithi alludes. The texts allow flexibility in the age of the groom, while consistently emphasising the youth of the bride. For instance, a man may marry at the age of twenty five, provided that the girl is significantly younger, a position explicitly reflected in the Vishnu Purana.
Vishnu Purana 3.10.16 “If he marry, he must select a maiden who is of a third of his age.” Tr. H.H. Wilson (Source)
Taken literally, this prescription implies that a forty year old man should marry a girl of approximately thirteen years, while a man of twenty would be expected to marry a girl of six or seven years. This interpretation is consistent with parallel prescriptions found in the Mahabharata and the Manu Smriti. However, apologists routinely overlook this explicit age disparity. Both the Mahabharata and the Manu Smriti clearly endorse the marriage of a thirty year old adult man to a prepubescent girl of ten to twelve years, defined as one third of his age. Ignoring this numerical framework allows apologists to obscure the intended meaning of these texts rather than engage with their implications directly.
Counter Argument: Vishnu Smriti 24.41 makes it clear that only those girls are considered degraded who haven’t given in marriage before they started menstruating, it doesn’t say keeping a married daughter who started menstruating in father’s home is degraded. It is because a girl has to stay in father’s home after her marriage till she completes her third year after she started menstruating, as we seen earlier.
Response: The internal logic of this counter argument appears to be self–contradictory. By acknowledging that a girl is deemed “degraded” if she is not wedded prior to menstruation, the apologist inadvertently reinforces the scriptural necessity of child marriage. Further elaboration is unnecessary, as the apologist’s own admission confirms the requirement for pre–pubescent betrothal.
